Based on the expierience and knowledge I have toward drugs, drug use, and the effects of, I have conclued that legalizing non-medicinal drugs would be be wrong. The capability these days to acquire drugs are very high.
Politics and law The Social Order There is a progression in the minds of men: This is just what is happening with the idea of legalizing drugs: If intoxication in one form or another is inevitable, then so is customary or legal restraint upon that intoxication.
But no society until our own has had to contend with the ready availability of so many different mind-altering drugs, combined with a citizenry jealous of its right to pursue its own pleasures in its own way. The arguments in favor of legalizing the use of all narcotic and stimulant drugs are twofold: Neither argument is negligible, but both are mistaken, I believe, and both miss the point.
The philosophic argument is that, in a free society, adults should be permitted to do whatever they please, always provided that they are prepared to take the consequences of their own choices and that they cause no direct harm to others.
Addiction to, or regular use of, most currently prohibited drugs cannot affect only the person who takes them—and not his spouse, children, neighbors, or employers.
Such a principle is virtually useless in determining what should or should not be permitted. But that is precisely the point. Human affairs cannot be decided by an appeal to an infallible rule, expressible in a few words, whose simple application can decide all cases, including whether drugs should be freely available to the entire adult population.
Philosophical fundamentalism is not preferable to the religious variety; and because the desiderata of human life are many, and often in conflict with one another, mere philosophical inconsistency in policy—such as permitting the consumption of alcohol while outlawing cocaine—is not a sufficient argument against that policy.
We all value freedom, and we all value order; sometimes we sacrifice freedom for order, and sometimes order for freedom. But once a prohibition has been removed, it is hard to restore, even when the newfound freedom proves to have been ill-conceived and socially disastrous.
Even Mill came to see the limitations of his own principle as a guide for policy and to deny that all pleasures were of equal significance for human existence. It was better, he said, to be Socrates discontented than a fool satisfied. Mill acknowledged that some goals were intrinsically worthier of pursuit than others.
This being the case, not all freedoms are equal, and neither are all limitations of freedom: The freedom we cherish—or should cherish—is not merely that of satisfying our appetites, whatever they happen to be.
And we even recognize the apparent paradox that some limitations to our freedoms have the consequence of making us freer overall. The freest man is not the one who slavishly follows his appetites and desires throughout his life—as all too many of my patients have discovered to their cost.
We are prepared to accept limitations to our freedoms for many reasons, not just that of public order. Take an extreme hypothetical case: A corpse has no interests and cannot be harmed, because it is no longer a person; and no member of the public is harmed if he has agreed to attend such an exhibition.
Our resolve to prohibit such exhibitions would not be altered if we discovered that millions of people wished to attend them or even if we discovered that millions already were attending them illicitly. Our objection is not based upon pragmatic considerations or upon a head count:Against Drug Legalization term papers, essays and research papers available.
This paper presents arguments for and against drug legalizing. A list of how legalizing drugs would be beneficial to society as well as a list of why anti-drug laws should be even stronger are both present in the essay.
At the end of the paper, the author's personal. Jennifer Hall Legalization of Marijuana (Short Essay) POL American National Government Instructor: Saundra McDavid January 11, The legalization of medical marijuana is a current policy issue that has caused much tension between the different levels of .
While the legalization of drugs may sound sensible, it is full of faults which may greatly affect the society and those around it. Drug issues continue to elevate and expand, and legalizing drugs will no further result in a benefit.
Legalizing drugs can lead to an increase in addiction rates, crime rates, and abuse. So the legalization of drugs cannot be supported by philosophical principle.
But if the pragmatic argument in favor of legalization were strong enough, it might overwhelm other objections. It is upon this argument that proponents of legalization rest the larger part of their case. - Legalizing Drugs Drug legalization is an enduring question that presently faces our scholars.
This issue embraces two positions: drugs should not be legalized and drugs should be legalized.
These two positions contain an array of angles that supports each issue. Drug Legalization Drug abuse has progressively, over the last thirty years, become a tool for crime organizations and bureaucracies, independent and under the control of the federal government, used to transform drug addiction into a profit through the passage of countless laws against drug abuse.